Evolution of dot com in Singapore. What worked and what next?

June 29, 2006 by wonderdoggy  
Filed under Contributors Corner

Der Shing

Since the dot.com bust in 2001, what has happened to the dot.com companies from that time in the present? Der Shing, our guest contributor, shares his views on about the evolution of the dot.com companies in Singapore.

Contributed by Der Shing

Sharing my own experience on the topic written before as it got me thinking a fair bit more. JobsFactory was started as a job portal back in 1999. During that time, there were lots of start ups in Singapore which were in dot com. It was our own dot com boom. Companies like Interauct, Commontown, Wizoffice, eJazz, Nececity, Myscissors, asiastockwatch, catcha, zingasia, earth9, surfgold etc etc all raised lots of money and were advertising like crazy in mass media just to get “eyeballs”.

The idea was that we got lots of traffic first and IPO. We can figure out the revenue side later. It was really a fun period as there was a strong buzz and young fellas under 30 were sitting in board rooms making contra deals that inflated each others revenues while adding no actual cash flow.

Its damn funny now looking back. We attended quite a few parties and opening ceremonies and they spent so much money on the marketing and image and yet spent so little resource thinking about sales and business model. A typical consequence of cheap money.

My list above is for pure dot coms, i am not including players who closed like MPHonline, asiaone.com etc. These have parentage and roots in profitable businesses.

Fast forward to 2001 in the aftermath of the dot com crash. Funding all dried up and very quickly those without a revenue stream crashed and closed down. The survivors tended to be those who :

1) Moved into corporate market by tweaking their C2C or B2C software into a purely software vendor for large firms in specialized fields. Example :

a) Surfgold – from online currency type consumer model to loyalty and CRM software vendor for large MNCs. Doing very well now if I may add.

b) Earth9 – from some community C2C site to a CRM software provider for Starhub and others. Doing quite okay too. This company cute, their CEO used to be called DNA.

3) Commontown – Still around. They were some C2C community too and now are software providers for web sites which revolve around community. But i think this one not doing that well.

4) Of course, you got the suppliers of software like Adroit Innovations, managed to list but also died as nobody wanted to build expensive web sites after 2000.

Can’t think of others. That is how few survivors there were. The other category that survived and doing quite well are those that were in B2C or C2C and went deep into media area within their area of expertise. This group all making $2M – $10M range.

1) Hardwarezone – From just a site, to magazines and events and regional.

2) Catcha – From a yahoo wannabe, gave up online, moved to Malaysia too and now a decent sized publisher of magazines. Juice, Stuff, etc.

3) Shareinvestor – from community of investors to community + investor relations software provider + magazine publisher (new one).

4) Jobsdb, Jobstreet, JobsFactory – Job portal is a proven business model. So still job portal but branched into running events, magazines etc.

So if I do some projection. Fast forward to 2008, I believe the 2 models will still be there. One as specialist software vendors, the other as media companies who are rooted in online mediums but who also cross synergize with events and print and maybe even TV production (I know catcha is doing this).

In a sense group 2 are doing web 2.0, cuz they will be forced to be ever more interactive in their chosen channels. For my side, job portals which increasing allow users to feedback and interact among themselves about companies and jobs? Or to allow them to search for referrals (ala social networking sites) ? These are all possibilities.

One thing for sure, all the surviving companies listed above are profitable already. Sharing my experience. Make your own conclusions.

Editor’s note: On the subject, check out BL’s latest post, “Can Web 2.0 companies make money in Asia?“. For more on Der Shing and his entrepreneurial journey in jobFactory, do check out his post “JobsFactory Pte Ltd – A Start Up Journey“.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Posterous
  • Tumblr
  • del.icio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • Mixx
  • Technorati
  • email

No related posts.


triplepoint-job-board-ad-wanted-developers-500x

Comments

  • ken
    Looking back, many companies could have survived if they held on. Many simply gave up or broke up.

    Some companies had actually pick up some of the old models and working are working on them now.

    How do I know? Because if I had .....
  • Hey Cobalt, yes the definition of success matters a lot and I wrote about this in a forum on funkygrad before. Here it is again reproduced. I was writing about my definition of success for myself.

    "Often for SMEs I think success is defined by the founding team.

    Personally, I define it as follows :
    1) Product works and has a postitive impact on others.

    2) Monetary rewards are higher than working for others based on your own qualification, skills set etc. Eg, so for IB, Consultant types, their business needs to make at least a couple of million to pay themselves at least 150-200K a year. Fresh graduate, maybe 50K good enough.

    3) A constant learning process which is challenging and engaging.

    Other people will have different standards but I think one should not say that just because the company makes $X amount than it is not successful. It really depends on the personal goal(s) of the founder.

    "
  • While we wait for Wonderdoggy's reply, my reading seems like a dot com that was born from scratch (not a spinoff that got some sort of financial or personnel backing from an established company), and who managed to evolve with the business climate to make decent bottomlines over the years. While the companies mentioned in the posts aren't say as successful as even Creative, no doubt good enough to survive.

    Cobalt, share with us which dot coms you were talking about in your first comment?
  • Wonderdoggy, what's your definition of successful dot coms?
  • Let me see... there is :
    StreetDirectory - Good model , branched into selling virtualmap software to govt and clients and made news suing people used their maps without licensing.

    I really cannot think of any others. Lets share and see if got any others.
  • Hey CobaltPaladin, share with me the other dot coms. I am very interested in the field. It would be good to see each business model and see if they diverge from the 2 groups (software vendor or niche media company) mentioned in my post. thanks!
  • You missed out some pure dot com companies in Singapore that are successful. Many people may not know them as they didn't go the trailblazing way. They didn't raise money; they were self-funded. They didn't advertise like crazy because they were building a real business model and one-step-at-a-time. I know some of them. They are quietly successful. :)
blog comments powered by Disqus