Low-down on Negotiations (Part I)

June 29, 2006 by wannapreneur  
Filed under Contributors Corner

handshake

How do you negotiate on a deal with someone? Should it be a win-win situation or otherwise? Wannapreneur, our resident contributor, will take us through the low-down on negotiations.

Though it may not feel so, negotiation is actually a pretty big part of our daily personal or working lives. The skills and knowledge behind crafting a deal are thus essential to pick up.

In a general sense, one can approach negotiation with basically 2 types of mindsets, the “Win-Win” or the “Win-Lose”.

In the highly competitive environment today, a lot of us have grown accustomed to a zero-sum mentality with the attitude that someone has to lose out in order for ourselves to get ahead or get added benefits. This is common in cases for example in typical employer-employee relations — Employer wants to pay less and Employee wants to get paid more. This clearly illustrates the “Win-Lose” mentality at work. “Your loss is my gain” is the name of the game here. However, with both sides playing the same way, its easy to get stale-mated or end up with less than desired mutual benefits.

On the flip side, there is the “Win-Win” Mentality in which both sides stay aware of the needs and wants of the other party and find a common ground for mutual benefit. In some cases, a better working agreement or scenario may even be found if the spirit of trust and open-ness can be established. This is why more deals are actually sealed away from the meeting table rather than at it. In the local context, the term “makan diplomacy” has even sprung up from the Singapore delegates who negotiated the US-Singapore FTA. This shows the importance of establishing a common ground of trust as the foundation for talks and discussion.

There was a story of a management research done to compare managers’ negotiation styles from the States with those from Japan. An experiment was carried out and for both cases, a line was drawn on the floor between 2 managers, who were then tasked with just one simple objective : getting the other party to come over to your side.

The American managers tried all ways and means to bribe, coerce, trick or force the other party to budge and cross the line. And guess what? No progress whatsoever was achieved with both parties staying firm on their sides. The Japanese managers took a wholly different approach though. The thought about the situation and discussed about it, saying ” Hey, if I cross to your side and you cross to mine, doesn’t that make us both winners?” And so they shook on it and did just that.

So, think win-win and negotiation with both sides’ welfare in mind, and you just may end up with more than you expected in a shorter time.

(to be continued …. )

Editor’s Note: This article is published in Wannapreneur’s blog with the same title.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Posterous
  • Tumblr
  • del.icio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • Mixx
  • Technorati
  • email

No related posts.


triplepoint-job-board-ad-wanted-developers-500x

Comments

  • Anonymous
    Hi wannapreneur,

    I believe it's hard nowadays to seek a balance sometimes. Where as Money is actually the main motivator for all employment? All employees also seek for their own benefit to survive.

    When you think about it. Though most companies want to employ cheap labour to reduce cost. So they either start at third world countries where the standard of living is low. Where workers had been actually been dehumanized? But for those workers they either don't have a choice because they can't afford to pay for education. I am not going to specify any companies because this may create misunderstanding. But from what I watch from the video. The workers had been put to work extremely long shift hours in the factory. Sometimes they have to work 20hrs a day and only get paid $1 US dollars per day?

    This is very sad. Where workers had been treated by Cogs and Robots working monotonously within the factory. But because they come from a poor background with no qualification. They had been exploited by large industrial companies. Whereas if the other way round if the companies are based in US/Europe etc..You can imagine how much they need to spend on paying those employees. If let say each employees base salary is 20K compared to the worker in third world countries? which they only get paid $30 a month?

    Should this be considered ethical? They are working very hard same work effort. But they had been exploit by cheap labour? So sometimes it's unfair too. Should big companies had good social responsibilities eventhough their aim is Profit Maximization?

    Nowadays, Most employees in large companies uses collective bargaining power via Union to deal employers? In our country, We have a certain legalisation to follow, Like for example Govt set a minimum wage rate so that employers will bind with the employment act and not exploit the employees for lower wage via the minimum wage act. Which is also quite good as well.

    However, it's true that companies can treat the employee right but not in monetary terms. However, the question to be reconsidered once again? Will employees considered this as fair? Would they consider leaving the company if another company decide to offer them double pay? In reality, Employees will definitely leave. Because, of the fact that they have to survive. And they still have a family to feed. They will know they need a stable job with a stable pay. If they consider looking well after the company? What will they actually reap/benefit? Will the company actually give them extra perks/bonus incentives by the end of the year? Most employees will think far. Because of the word survival once again. And they will feel that they are in a Win-Lose situation as well.
  • Wannapreneur, good point. Rather than look at either the cake is yours OR mine, think of creative ways to share it or get another one!
  • Thanks for the comment!

    Actually I feel that it has become pretty lopsided and unfortunately common for local employers and employees who focus mainly on financial compensations. There should be other areas of focus that contribute equally, if not more, to both sides' position.

    One interesting way of looking at it is if it stays as a win-lose issue on the amount of pay, who's focusing on making the business better? Or should we examine the Southwest Airline philosophy of "putting the employees first?". Its a pretty simple logic cycle where you treat the employees right(need not be monetary), the employees treat the customers well, the customers come back again, profitability rises and the company can afford more to treat the employee better. Isn't this reinforcing model better than contending with an internal tug-of-war?
  • Anonymous
    That is a good article Wannaprenuer. I think usually a Win-Win scenario is the best solution for both parties. It's true employers want to win and employees want a better pay. But that's what today working society is about. If let say your boss is willing to pay you 20K for this role you are doing. And another company is willing to offer 60K for the same role. Which offer would you take?

    Sometimes, Employees also have to look after themselves 20K you will be struggling with your life especially with today's high standard of living. If you think about your company. Would your company consider what can happen to you? You will be facing with debts, barely can feed yourself pay off your bills, You will be having alot of dissatisfaction which equate to Win - Lose situation.. It's true company vision is about cutting cost and maximising profitability. But sometimes there must be a balance as well like you mentioned negotiation enters to solve this problem like two person sit down and shake hands together. If you take up 60K can help to manage your loan and also help you to manage with financial problem and you are happy working with the company. Then it would be a win-win situation for both..

    But sometimes they might be a lose-lose situation as well. If both parties do not come to any agreement this usually refers to competitors of the market where Price War occur and both producers can lose out in the market fighting over rock bottom prices.
blog comments powered by Disqus