News Stop: The Life Sciences Conundrum

October 9, 2006 by SGEntrepreneurs  
Filed under News Stop

We refer to this interesting headline “The Life Sciences Conundrum” (reported by Loh Chee Kiong). Among the educators, this is a known problem that we are having a surplus of life science graduates who may have to end up doing other kinds of jobs other than washing test tubes. Here are some thoughts and possibly solutions to the problem. We want to dispense some advice for those who might be graduating soon with a life sciences degree.

In retrospect, I like the positive spin of this article (see below) that those who propagate the biotech drive are not to be blamed because they told everyone that they should do a PhD in order to get a job. Is it because they know that the multi-national companies are not willing to employ local undergraduates in marketing, sales and business development? Even the universities acknowledged that they cannot take such a high number. So, who is really responsible for the problem?

Inherently, I do not fault the authorities and the universities, but I would say that the students who signed up have to realize why they end up in this situation. Social engineering is common, and it has happened for engineers and IT industries for the past two decades. Somehow, no one seem to remember what happened to these people. Most of my peers who was caught in the engineering bubble fifteen years back are now selling insurance, stock-brokering and doing any other job but engineering. So, you will be hear the conventional excuse from the authorities that “we are here to facilitate but not here to find you a job”.

Actually, it is not that bleak. I know of life science graduates (since part of my portfolio is on biomedical and biotech commercialization) who manage to get the high end jobs for the pharma companies. However, they are far and few between. Let me give some numbers and why they manage to get these jobs:

  • Internships with companies: Most Singaporean students like to spend their summer vacation to do nothing, instead taking an internship in a life-science related companies (or even startups). My cousin is also a life science undergraduate and when I ask him what he is doing in the holidays. He ended up telling me that he’s going on holidays and his favourite comment, “I will find a job when the time comes.” I am pretty sure that he will not find a job by the end. In contrast, out of ten students, about 1 Singaporean and 9 foreign students will be applying for internships. To get these high paying jobs need networks and not going for holidays. There are a few who actually got a job in overseas pharma companies because they took their holidays to work as an intern in Germany or Switzerland. So, we cannot put the burden on the universities and polytechnics to arrange the internships, but the students need to do the homework.
  • Life Sciences require not just book knowledge but also commercial knowledge: There are people who want to go into the life science markets, but they did not realize that commercialization is a necessity to be in the industry. Perhaps, they should start using their cross-faculty courses to take some business modules on technopreneurship

Nevertheless, I leave you to read this article and think about what you should really do.

The Life Sciences Conundrum

After the hype, grads now realise that there’s no place for them in the industry

Loh Chee Kong
cheekong@mediacorp.com.sg

IN 2002, when Singapore universities had barely begun producing their own life sciences graduates, Mr Philip Yeo, chairman of the Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*Star), famously rattled those undergraduates when he said that they would only be qualified to wash test tubes.

But four years on, armed with their Bachelor’s degree, some of these graduates are learning the truth of his words the hard way. Many from the first cohort have ended up in junior research positions or manufacturing and sales jobs in the industry — positions that do not require a life sciences degree. Others find themselves completely out of the field.

Said Edmund Lim, 27, who graduated two years ago, and now works as a property agent: “One of my classmates is working illegally in Australia, peddling psychotropic drugs to clubbers. Many of my classmates have gone into teaching. Others are in pharmaceutical or equipment sales.”

Another life sciences graduate, who declined to be named, found a job recently at a tuition centre, after failing to land research-related positions for over a year despite numerous job applications.

Already an established base for pharmaceutical manufacturing, Singapore has been trying, in the past five years, to move beyond manufacturing to more high-end research that is “value-added”.

According to the industry’s annual reviews compiled by A*Star and the Economic Development Board’s Biomedical Sciences Group (EDB BMSG), an average of a thousand new jobs were created annually for the past five years. Last year, there were 10,200 manufacturing jobs in the industry, almost doubling the 5,700 jobs created in the then-fledgling sector in 2001. By 2015, EDB targets the number of such jobs to hit 15,000.

But the booming figures mask a Catch-22 situation: The current shortage of PhD holders in the biomedical sciences cluster is hampering Singapore’s bid to attract multinational companies to move their high-end research projects here. Without a PhD, most of Singapore’s life sciences graduates are only qualified to work as research assistants.

And both graduates and diploma holders vie for these positions that could pay less than $2,000 a month. In the industry’s manufacturing sector, life sciences graduates compete against their peers from other general sciences and engineering disciplines. They face even stiffer competition in the sales sector, where paper qualifications take on less significance.

A*Star’s Biomedical Research Council oversees and coordinates public sector biomedical research and development activities. On the surplus of life sciences graduates, its executive director Dr Beh Swan Gin told Today: “It is not a situation that can be easily communicated, as there are many factors involved. Simply put, a PhD is essential for progress as a researcher. And there are still not enough Singaporeans pursuing PhD studies.”

Adding that the local universities should not pander to the students’ demand for the subject, Dr Beh said: “The job market of today and tomorrow, is the market the universities should focus on. The manufacturing and commercial jobs have always been there, albeit there are more of these now. NUS (National University of Singapore) and NTU (Nanyang Technological University) should get better data on the demand for life science graduates at the Bachelor’s degree level.”

In 2001, NUS’ Science Faculty rolled out an integrated life sciences curriculum and NTU started its School of Biological Sciences (SBS) a year later. Meanwhile, the polytechnics also introduced more life sciences courses. Thousands of students jumped on the bandwagon, with demand outstripping the supply of places in these courses.

Professor Tan Eng Chye, NUS’ Dean of Science — who believes that it could take another five years for the industry to establish itself — acknowledged that his school’s intake of life sciences undergraduates was “a bit too high”.

“When we started offering a major in life sciences in 2001, 550 students took up the programme. For the subsequent intakes, the number stabilised at about 450. But we would be more comfortable with about a hundred less,” said Prof Tan, who added that many students were “unrealistic” about their job prospects.

Said Prof Tan: “A lot of students were probably all hyped up to look for R&D jobs. And when they can’t get such jobs, they could be disappointed. If they want to do research, they should further their studies.”

Nonetheless, some headhunters, like Kelly Services’ Lita Nithiyanandan, predict that it is “only a matter of time” before these “highly valued” graduates find willing employers. Said Ms Nithiyanandan: “As most of these multinational life sciences companies have recently set up or moved their R&D centres to Singapore, they require senior and experienced research professionals at this stage to streamline operations and get compounds approved fast for clinical trials. Once these centres are more established they will definitely need fresh graduates for researching new compounds.”

She added: “Overall, Singapore’s biomedical scene is evolving as a mature hub for Asia Pacific. This would create opportunities across the board for skill sets through the value chain from fresh graduates to mid-level research and analysts to high-end PhD professionals.”

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Posterous
  • Tumblr
  • del.icio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • Mixx
  • Technorati
  • email

No related posts.


triplepoint-job-board-ad-wanted-developers-500x

Comments

  • Ava
    I read your website every week, its great and got lots of information to take in and lots of interesting articles.
  • L
    In terms of career options and prospects, it is always better to pursue a professional degree rather than arts or science degrees which are usually considered general. Research jobs are only for the top students of the cohort and don't forget university award degrees based on bell curve. At the end of your four years, you could be ending up wasting your time pursuing a degree that cannot land you a decent paying job.
  • Benjamin Linus
    I recommend that for someone unsure of what they want to do in the future, pursue a degree that will be of value. Life science, is not appealing to many corporate employers, business and accountancy are. So why waste so much time trying to fight for a second upper where one can with relatively ease obtain the same standing in the 2 courses? Btw Business minor don`t seem to appeal to employees either.

    So unless you don`t mind doing routine work and not being able to chart major progress in your life, or you are definitely sure of doing PhD, consider other options.
  • Anderson
    Speaking from personal experience, many undergraduates choose to believe in the rosy picture of being able to work in the life science industry, even as they are about to graduate. Many of my peers refused to see that the industry does not provide satisfaction for a degree holder. The job scope is routine, mundane, and ones output is just a minute part of the whole research project. As a lab technician, which many without a PhD will doing, one is at best expendables. One needs to ask if it is worth it to waste their time doing things that may not contribute much to the scientific community, not being able to put one`s talent to good use, and getting paid peanuts. I was told that even if you work all your life in a govt. research agency, your pay will not exceed $4000. Do you want to work in an environment insulated from the outside world, ignorant of "The Shock Doctrine", or global affairs.

    Indeed, life science is not an easy subject to excel in, and it take quite a bit of effort. Worst still, the course apparently does not appeal to banks and many non-life science industries. In applying for internship, I did not receive a single response from the banks(GS,ML,Citi,SCB,HSBC,DBS), 4 consulting firms, nor the 7 ad agencies which i applied, even with a decent CCA record. One really has to ask if it`s worth pursuing such as course.
  • Calvin Neo
    I read the thread thus far and can't help but feel there many LS students are facing serious difficulties. As a recent engineering graduate from NUS, I experience similar problems.

    My advice is short and clear - What are you going to do about it?

    I am sorry to say that if a PhD is the best bet you have, then risk is needed to pursue it. If money is the immediate concern, they take up a job first to meet your short term expenses. If Singapore is not good, look overseas. If you are bonded, break it or accept it...

    I apologize for having to put solutions across in such harsh manner. But to all my dear friends, we made certain decisions and came thus far. Even if we were (unitentionally) led to where we are, the lesson is to recognize that we still move on but now hopefully became smarter.
  • HL
    Hi,
    This is an interesting read regarding life-sciences graduates in Singapore.
    I do agree that you will need a PhD to continue independent research, on the other hand, there may just not be enough opportunities for PhD holders. Take myself for example, I have a Masters degree in Clinical Neuroscience, and about 6 years of research experience in Cognitive Neuroscience. Due to funding problems, I couldn't do my PhD, and now with each passing year, the opportunity cost of doing a PhD for me increases.
    When I decided to look for jobs other than research, most of the employers have found that I'm too research-oriented, or that my area of research expertise is not what they are looking for. I have taken some business management modules at the undergraduate level, but that does not count for them. Sigh. I would like to expand my current field of expertise to the corporate sector, but the opportunities are too limited for me. At present, I'm still searching for a job in the biomedical sciences sector, but no success so far. This process is frustrating and depressing.
    In my opinion, for Singapore to be a biomedical sciences research hub, it has to have a diverse range of neuroscience resarch, from molecular to systems level. Typically, a clinical disease is affected at each stage of neuroscience. I think to focus on a particular stage of neuroscience research will hinder our development to being a biomedical sciences research hub.
  • Sigh
    Anea
    Like anyone who obtained a second lower, it is diffcult to pursue a PhD here even by self-finance. The universities must first approve your application, and both NUS and NTU request for a second upper. I reckon they have too many applicantions and has to adhere to a quota. I agree with wolf, the best way is to approach the PI of the lab, email may not be the best mean, try calling the PI. Try sale position, you will meet more PIs this way and also will allow for more time to understand their research. A good service establishes a good relationship between the PI and you. Maybe after 1-2 years, if your passion is burning, approach the PI.
  • wolf
    Anea,

    The 2nd lower requirement is very frustrating for us at the research institues too whenever we want to hire people; we find a lot of good candidates who we have to fight for because admin/HR will throw them out without even looking just because of grades.

    My advice is not to submit your resume directly (ie via the official online channel) to the institute/company where you intend to apply, but contact the principal investigators and project leaders if you can and talk to them directly. Ask to see their lab and express an interest in their work (if you ask for a job directly, they may just tell you to submit your resume to HR). Sometimes they have positions (mainly GAP/research officers) available - and sometimes not advertised either - and if you can convince them of your passion and skills, you can push your resume and job application through them. The chances of landing a position are often higher this way compared to submitting your applications cold.
  • True passion lead to greatness.
    Until we see education and academic as a mean rather than as a end, we probably not going anywhere.
  • Anea,
    that's pretty sad that a foreign talent like you will land in such a state.

    Yes, I strongly believe the system here is wrong. Having local and foreigner to compete against each other in a dog-eat-dog world and the so called free-market, and that grading is ultimate criteria for high flyer promotion doesn't sound like Singapore is going to attract and groom great talent. It is more discouraging than encouraging. Instead of collaborating, we are competing.

    It is perhaps with such kind of system that permeates the working environment that ppl cannot find true passion in their work, let alone find greatness.

    Hope gov will review its policy and stop implying that academic=intelligent. I find many talented ppl here of many fields that is downplayed because of poor academic result, but i can say their work achievement generally suppress those of so called "academic achiever".
  • Anea
    I am a foreigner who studied in the NUS. My english was so bad when i came. I gave up the medical education in my country which is free for me and it was one of the top medicine school. I woould not having any difficulties to be recruited even i had worst grades. And if i can persue the specialty i would be rich. However for the passion of the research i came here. I did not know they were having 500+ students for life sciences in NUS alone. My grades are not excellent now... it is honours with second lower...Well why did i get a low grade isnt it? There are lots of reasons of course. But i should tell you people who get much greater grades are not better than those who get less. When i did study to my lessons (the ones i find interesting) i got top grades (i am not kidding i was in first 10 people) then there are lots of stupid classes which i refused to study because they teach nothing to you. Instead, i read my juornals on my own interests and at the end of course i did no good in those classes. Okey there maybe an arrogant behavior here but many of my professors regarded me well knowing person. Another thins, in NUS you can not see your final paper.What the most stupid thing on earth!!! Then what is the point i am taking classes. Prof's do wrong, they do grade wrong and it happened to me for many many times which we corrected in the midterms. Than what about finals? so you think there is a very fair judgement going in. This part is very annoying so i stop here because i dont think i can continue without swaring (God forgive what i do wrong). In addition, I find no flexibility in here, everything is just about grades... They do not look your ideas or anyhing (they look if you have the grades). This was also told by one of the high end scientist in Biopolis (i can not remembr now) whom Singapore brought from overseas. I graduated this year and i am looking for a job, i could not find any yet... Many do not except because i do not have PR and Singapore citizenship, PhD or experience. I want to do PhD with self-finance (as i can not get any scholarship) but if no one recruits me i can not do that either. Now it is over one month now and my family can not support me to stay here anylonger. Goverment is asking me to stay 3 years as a bond. And do you know what! i am going to leave if i can not find a job within another month because i have no other choice. Is it a bad thing? yes maybe, but what do you call what the government did to us? ruining our lives. And they are recruiting more foreigner students. I had no slightest idea it would be like this. Now even locals can not find job. But i think one local should thank me because i occupied his/here place in university so that he/she would not be jobless but me :) well you see the irony isnt it? Well ther is much to tell but what will change anyway? (not a question demanding answer)

    P.S. I did UROPS and FYP and one summer internship overseas
  • coal
    Hi wolf,
    Yes..Maybe I am lucky in some sense. Though things may be slow, at least there is progress. But i believe it takes 2 hands to clap. Students initiative to learn and mentors' passion to impart knowledge. Probably, luck plays a small role as well. To meet the right people, to learn from the right people.
  • wolf
    Heya coal,
    Well, you're in a lucky position then. In the past 2+ years that I have been working, I've had to rescue a few students from their supervisors. Maybe it's a supervisor attitude thing, or a cultural thing, or simply just a language thing - seriously, even with higher chinese and all, how many singaporean kids can communicate scientific jargon and concepts in a second language?

    The culture at some places is also pretty much "do whatever the master says". And unfortunately in way too many cases, many bad and even dangerous work practices are blindly propagated along in this fashion (how bad? Let's try chemical handling - including HF for wafer cleaning - without goggles or proper gloves). And the students are often asked to do this without an understanding of what they are doing, or of the dangers involved. Sure, it's test-tube washing, and an important process since the cleanliness of your gear and samples will affect the result of your subsequent nanofabrication steps. But the significance, importance and related hazards should be emphasized to the students.

    Again it's numbers - it doesn't matter whether your student learns anything, he's just another figure to boost your performance appraisal at the end of the year.

    There's really a big gap here between how a scientific culture operates, and how "the administration" thinks a scientific culture operates. Yes, it's slowly changing for the better, and I am proud of being part of that process, but it's awfully slow and frustrating at times!
  • coal
    Hi wolf,
    Be positive. I do not say there are none of these kind of scientists around, but rest assure that what I see have been very positive so far. Researchers have been patient and supportive to their students overall. Sometimes, we also need to consider the students' attitudes. Afterall, it takes 2 hands to clap. As a mentor myself to some students myself, I feel that we should be fair. Give recognition and support to the right people, right students. I am not too sure by what you mean when you say "wash test tubes". But I can tell you even my mentor does her own washings. Lab duties are done by all. Does not mean that researchers will do the experiments and the students do the clearing up. Not true. One batch our jc students complained to me before, that they are here to do experiments, not to clear rubbish. A totally wrong attitude. The rubbish generated in the lab are not ordinary garbage, they a hazardous waste, bioharzards. We have cleaning aunties here but they never touch our waste. They are not to, since the researchers are the trained people to know how to dispose of these waste correctly. I must emphasize that waste disposal is an important work. It is the last and final step to an experiment. Proper disposal will ensure we are not polluting our envt and waters. (I do see students pouring toxins down the pipes. Where do you think these toxins will go to? Yes, to the sewage systems, to the canals, to the seas, to the oceans.. I do not need to elaborate further)
  • coal
    Hi BL,
    I am glad to hear that. Appreciates your efforts. If there is any help you may need, I will be glad to help.
  • BL
    Coal,

    I can tell you that I am in the process of getting a module on commercialization of life sciences approved in the Science Faculty, NUS so that we can link the industry with the students. I have actually solicited help from the biotech community and they have agreed to work with me for guest-lecturing in the course.
  • wolf
    Since we're still playing the blame game (*grin*), I'll throw in another comment - Of those who have been lucky to get interns and junior positions in the industry, how many of them have been turned off by the lack of support and mentorship at their workplaces?

    There seems to be this prevailing viewpoint in at least one research institute, that interns, FYPs and junior staff are regarded as no more than grunt labour. Their work often is just washing testtubes (in a metaphorical sense), and when asked, are unable to explain why they're doing so. Yes, we can easily brush this off by saying they should be having more initiative and learning on their own, but we have to remember that these are kids fresh out of school - this can be the first time they're exposed to a research environment, and we can't expect them to suddenly grow into researchers. Mentorship and guidance are still things that only their supervisors can provide.

    I don't know if that's what the education system churns out, but I see a lot of attachment kids who are obviously bright, but who just take orders from a supervisor without questioning. Is it an Asian face saving thing, maybe? That if you don't know what's going on, you don't ask questions from your supervisors because that's a sign of weakness, that you can't find out something yourself just by reading? Sure, reading up works for classes and mundane tasks, but there are so many other aspects of research that no book can tell you about.

    Are supervisors aware of this? That they need to put in extra effort to draw out their wards, encourage and motivate them? Or are supervisors just seeing these guys as mere numbers, to be added to your KPI total so that their project and performance appraisals looks good? That's an unfortunate trend that I see in the research scene here - many people are treated as statistics. Number of Singaporean PhDs, number of staff spun out to industry, number of students "trained", etc. Where's the need for passion when all that "the administration" cares about are just numbers?
  • coal
    Thank you for your advise, bjorn. I am not one who sits and do nothing. Why I even bother to comment here is also because I see this as a ground to spread the message, hopefully to the people who have the authority and means to change the current system. I do not know which field you specialise, but I can say I will not be able to completely understand your situation. What I am trying to do here is also to voice out the endless comments and views of my fellow coursemates, who are also in the same situation as me. And I am not bias against honours grads. I do have plenty in my life science social circle. They do not look down or feel non-honours grads are in any way worse or less competent. It is the system that is bias. And I am hoping my message and comments are getting to the people who takes care of the system.
  • I am not going to score brownie points on this comment thread but to substantiate my last point on people who succumb to our local system and give in instead of constuctively changing it, we will never have people like Mervyn Tan (renowned violinist who skipped NS) and Willie Tann (top earning gambler and ex-schoolmate of Goh Chok Tong).

    Our local system has a problem. We shouldn't have "blame-govt-first" mentality when shit happens but try to change it.

    Related links:
    http://commentarysingapore.blogspot.com/2006/05...
    http://www.todayonline.com/pdf_main.asp?pubdate...
  • HI V4 and Coal, I am not a LS graduate, so thanks for enlightening me. I am a true believer that you need passion to do anything, but passion alone is useless if you do not take action to develop skillsets that will make you cross into the talent sphere.

    My takeaway from both of you is that there's something wrong with the curriculum design in local universities then since many local students are syllabus-oriented and less likely to take on extra-curricular research projects and hands-on experience.

    And I have a personal message for coal. Your comment inspired my previous response. I do not know you so please mitigate your response accordingly with respect to the impersonal nature of computer-mediated communications on a blog thread.

    I felt a strong sense of despondency in your comment and the draining of passion after experiencing life in the polis for 2 years. Like yourself, i am experiencing a decision dilemma between earning to survive and living my passion. Its seems there's an implied systemic biasedness against non-honors grads that is a dampener on the dreams and ambitions of passionate life science researchers like yourself.

    My message is if you feel so strongly, do continue to support and spread the message through civic means to change the system. Tis message is not meant to be strong but I cannot help but feel mad everytime I read blogs and forums that rail at the system while I sit in front of my computer wondering why the hell these people who feel so strongly are doing nothing but meekly following the system like drones when they are away from their computers.

    Do something, dun just complain in silence at the system.
blog comments powered by Disqus